USPTO serial 76422708
APOLLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with APOLLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morton J. Rosenberg, Esq.
MORTON J ROSENBERG ESQ ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CTR DRSTE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER CHIPS, NAMELY, ETHERNET AND FAST ETHERNET LOCAL-AREA NETWORK CONTROLLER CHIPS; COMPUTER MAGNETICALLY ENCODED CARDS; COMPUTER LOCAL-AREA NETWORK CARDS, NAMELY, ENCODED ELECTRONIC CHIP CARDS FOR IDENTIFYING PARTICULAR USERS OF COMPUTERS; MODEMS, NAMELY, PERSONAL COMPUTER FACSIMILE MODEM ARDS, UNIVERSAL SERIAL BUS MODEMS AND EXTERNAL MODEMS; ELECTRONIC SWITCHES FOR USE IN ANALYZING AND TESTING EQUIPMENT FOR COMPUTER NETWORKS, ELECTRIC SWITCHES, AND ELECTRONIC MOTION SENSITIVE SWITCHES; COMPUTER NETWORK HUBS; COMPUTER NETWORK ROUTERS; NETWORK GATEWAYS; NETWORK BRIDGES; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; NETWORK TRANSMISSION MULTIPLEXERS; NETWORK TRANSMISSION CONCENTRATORS; COMMUNICATION SERVERS; MAGNETIC ENCODED CARD READERS; AND WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK CARDS AND ACCESS POINTS THAT USE HIGH-FREQUENCY RADIO WAVES, NAMELY, 802.11, GPRS, GSM, CDMA, BLUETOOTH, PWLAN AND VOICE/IP | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 3, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 28, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |