USPTO serial 76422714
BRAINZTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRAINZTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Neuberger Weller
SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS GLOVSKY12010 SUNSET HLS RDSTE 900RESTON, VA 20190Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MULTIMEDIA COMMUNICATION SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE TO FACILITATE ONLINE INTERACTIVE AUDIO, VIDEO, AND TEXT COMMUNICATIONS FOR DIRECT ANT) EFFICIENT SHARING OF KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS AND BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS AND BUSINESSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | MARKETING INTERACTIVE BUSINESS AND CONSUMER COMMUNICATION PRODUCTS FOR THIRD PARTIES, NAMELY, MULTIMEDIA COMMUNICATION SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE TO FACILITATE ONLINE INTERACTIVE AUDIO, VIDEO, AND TEXT COMMUNICATIONS FOR DIRECT AND EFFICIENT SHARING OF KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS AND BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS AND BUSINESSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | CUSTOMIZED PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT OF INTERACTIVE BUSINESS AND CONSUMER COMMUNICATION PRODUCTS FOR THIRD PARTIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |