Drawing for MONARC

USPTO serial 76422963

MONARC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONARC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009video recordings featuring music and musical entertainment produced under Applicant's mark but not produced, marketed or distributed as a home video line; downloadable audio-visual recordings featuring music and musical entertainment produced under Applicant's mark but not produced, marketed or distributed as part of a home video lineACTIVE—
038Streaming of audio and visual content, namely, music, musical performances, musical entertainment, drama, musical based radio programs, musical based television programs, over a global computer network; providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users concerning music, musical based entertainment, films, entertainment events and related information; providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning music, musical based entertainment, entertainment events and related information, none of the foregoing related to, or containing as primary content, information regarding professional sports or sporting events, none of the foregoing emanating from a casino or resort of the same name, and none of the foregoing produced, marketed or distributed as a home video line and all of the foregoing offered in connection with entertainment projects produced under or in association with Applicant's markACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely producing concerts, stage shows, music festivals, live musical performances, motion picture film production, production of television programs and television specials, production of radio programs and radio specials; internet services, namely providing a website on a global computer network featuring information on music, musical performances, musical performers, featured artists of, music on and activities of a record label, motion pictures, television programs and television specials; providing digitally prerecorded music online via a global computer network; record production services; recording studios; music publishing services, none of the foregoing related to, or containing as primary content information regarding professional sports or sporting events, none of the foregoing emanating from a casino or resort with the same name and none of the foregoing produced, marketed or distributed as a home video line and all of the foregoing offered in connection with entertainment projects produced under or in association with Applicant's markACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2003DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 27, 2003DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 30, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2002AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance