USPTO serial 76423038
WE PROTECT COMPANIES BY SECURING THE VALUE CHAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 11, 2003
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WE PROTECT COMPANIES BY SECURING THE VALUE CHAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph V. Myers III
JOSEPH V MYERS III SEYFARTH SHAW LLP1545 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 700ONE PEACHTREE POINTEATLANTA, GA 30309-2401Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business management in the field of authentication technology solutions for combating counterfeiting, diversion, intellectual property piracy, royalty fraud and remarking of products; providing business reports, namely, providing data regarding unauthorized commerce of the products and tracing a brand name product manufacturing source to its retail destination | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 18, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |