USPTO serial 76423063
ABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald F. Frei, Esq.
DONALD F FREI ESQ WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP2700 CAREW TWR441 VINE STCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Elasticity and durability enhancing chemical additives for belts, namely, power transmission belts, drive belts, synchronous belts, timing belts, connector belts, and cleaning belts, all for machinery and off-the-road vehicle and snowmobile applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Carlisle Management Company
- Other trademarks owned by Carlisle Management Company
- Other trademarks owned by Carlisle Intangible Company
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named ABLE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |