USPTO serial 76423364
PLATINUM CONCIERGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLATINUM CONCIERGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer M. Mikulina
Jennifer M. Mikulina McDermott Will & Emery LLP227 W. Monroe StreetSuite 4400Chicago, IL 60606-5096Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Concierge service for others comprising making requested personal arrangements and reservations and providing customer-specific information to meet individual needs rendered together to mobile phone users | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 31, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |