USPTO serial 76423457
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steve Ackerman
STEVE ACKERMAN WALT DISNEYTHE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521-0639| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Rubber action balls; action figures and accessories therefor; action skill games; bean bag dolls; plush toys; balloons; golf balls; tennis balls; bath toys; Christmas tree ornaments; board games; toy building blocks; equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; playing cards; dolls and doll clothing; doll playsets; children's play cosmetics; crib toys; electric action toys; manipulative games; golf gloves; golf ball markers; jigsaw puzzles; kites; crib and toy mobiles; music box toys; party favors in the nature of small toys; inflatable pool toys; baby and children's multiple activity toys; wind-up toys; target games; disc-type toss toys; toy bows and arrows; toy vehicles; model toy cars; model toy trucks; toy bucket and shovel sets; roller skates; toy model hobbycraft kits; toy rockets; toy guns; toy holsters; musical toys; toy badminton sets; bubble making wands and solution sets; modeled plastic toy figurines; toy banks; puppets; yo-yos; skateboards; toy scooters; face masks; hand-held unit for playing electronic games; talking toys; toy model walkie-talkies; toy model electronic voice recorders | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 20, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |