Drawing for ALLWORX

USPTO serial 76423485

ALLWORX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2878357Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 31, 2004
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with ALLWORX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dennis B. Danella, Esq.

Dennis B. Danella, Esq. Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP1900 Bausch & Lomb PlaceRochester, NY 14604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009server that fully integrates communications and data infrastructure in one purpose built appliance providing PBX voice mail and auto attendant telephony, [ unified email,] voice and fax messaging, WAN access with firewall and high speed LAN support,[ internal and external web server/email server/file server,] secure remote user access (VPN) and group collaboration features, namely, [ calendaring,] address books, [ document sharing, discussion groups,] instant messaging and presence informationACTIVEMay 17, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2024NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2024RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 25, 202489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Feb 25, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 1, 2023E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2023REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2021ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 28, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 21, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 28, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 28, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2014NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2014RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jul 10, 201489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jul 10, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 26, 2014E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 27, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 22, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 28, 2010C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 28, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 8, 2010E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2009CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 4, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 28, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 1, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 31, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 8, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 19, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2004REINREINSTATED—
Nov 3, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 25, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance