Drawing for MADO

USPTO serial 76423533

MADO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MADO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Hill

DAVID W HILL FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software in the field of image conversation technology downloadable from a global computer network; computer programs in the field of high resolution imaging conversation; computer operating programs which allow for batch processing and multi-server settings which facilitate greater processing flexibility; computer operating programs to convert and upload data to a web server; computer video programs; and electric batteries; slot machines; electric irons; electric hair-curlers; electric buzzers; railway signals, vehicles breakdown warning triangles; luminous or mechanical road signs; fire alarms; gas leak alarms; fire extinguishers; fire hose nozzles; sprinkler systems for fire protection; vending machines; coin-operated gates for car parking facilities; cash registers; coin counting or sorting machines; and electric automatic door openers and closersACTIVE—
035Advertising agencies and publicity agents; business management analysis for businesses provided through computer networks; business consultancy for business provided through computer networks; management or business organizational consultation relating to information processing and organization of computer networks; marketing research; reproduction of electronic publications; rental of office machinery and equipment, namely, computers, typewriters, photocopiers, and word processorsACTIVE—
036Providing information via a global computer network regarding the sale of commoditiesACTIVE—
041Rental of on-line books, manuals, and magazinesACTIVE—
042design, programming, or maintenance of computer programs for others; creating or maintaining web sites for others; rental of computers, namely, central processing units and peripheral devices such as electronic circuits storing computer programs, magnetic disks, magnetic tapes, rental of computer programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 18, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 28, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 27, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance