Drawing for WINTER GARDEN

USPTO serial 76423582

WINTER GARDEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WINTER GARDEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kay Lyn Schwartz

KAY LYN SCHWARTZ GARDERE WYNNE SEWELL1601 ELM ST STE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201-4761UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008metal flatwareACTIVE—
021table top items, namely, decanters cruets, beverage pitchers, canisters, spice jars, gravy boat and saucer, deviled egg dish, butter dish, salt and pepper shakers, sugar bowls and creamer pitchers, vases, candle holders not of precious metals and accessories, namely pillar holders, votive holders; crystal beverage ware, bowls and the like; napkin rings, bowls, trays, namely serving trays, caddies, namely utensils, napkins and the like all made of wood; serving utensils, namely, serving forks, serving spoons, ladles, cake/pie server, lasagna server, ice cream scoop, pasta fork; holders, namely vegetable, pie/cake, bakeware and tealight holders; racks namely spice, wine; wine charms, casserole and dutch ovensACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 23, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 29, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 6, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 9, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance