Drawing for THE PERFECT CLUB

USPTO serial 76423583

THE PERFECT CLUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PERFECT CLUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROVIDING CONSUMER PRODUCT INFORMATION VIA THE INTERNET IN THE FIELD OF GOLFACTIVEJul 18, 2002
042PROVIDING CURRENT NEWS INFORMATION RELATED TO GOLFING VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 29, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 29, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 29, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 29, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 31, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 26, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 31, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 31, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 29, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 2, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 15, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 9, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 30, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance