USPTO serial 76423637
MAROON5
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAROON5?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary S. Phillips, Esq.
GARY S PHILLIPS ESQ LAW OFFICE OF GARY S PHILLIPS9460 WILSHIRE BLVD FIFTH FLBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-2711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, live and recorded performances by a musical band | ACTIVE | Jan 20, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARMICHAEL, JESSIE
- Other trademarks owned by DUSICK, RYAN
- Other trademarks owned by LEVINE, ADAM
- Other trademarks owned by MADDEN, MICKEY
- Other trademarks owned by VALENTINE, JAMES
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MAROON5
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |