USPTO serial 76423640
VEGETAL PROTEIN LIFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VEGETAL PROTEIN LIFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JENNIFER SHMULEWITZ
ROBERT L SHERMAN PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP75 E 55TH STNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Face creams and moisturizers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |