USPTO serial 76423690
IGALERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3194748Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 2, 2007
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IGALERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Oakville, CA
Oakville, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
JEFFREY A SMITH MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201-3331UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on 44(e)) Computer software for use in the casino and gaming industries to establish, manage and maintain a database of patron information that can be accessed by security and other authorized personal | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | (Based on Use in Commerce) (Based on 44(e)) Providing an on-line computer database that provides current information for security purposes in the nature of photo identification, namely, physical attributes, personal information and the like concerning casino and gaming players and patrons | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 26, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 4028546 Canada Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 4028546 Canada Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by 4028546 Canada Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named IGALERT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 21, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |