USPTO serial 76423721
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Vernon, British Columbia, V1T 7G8, CA
Vernon, British Columbia, V1T 7G8, CA
Vernon, British Columbia, V1T 7G8, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael O. Sturm
MICHAEL O STURM HENDERSON & STURM206 SIXTH AVE STE 1213DES MOINES, IA 50309-4076UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | wall shelving | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |