USPTO serial 76423812
YORK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 5, 2009
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with YORK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond Rundelli
Raymond Rundelli Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP1405 East Sixth StreetThe Calfee BuildingCleveland, OH 44114-1607Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Chrome finial hooks, single hooks of chrome, single hooks of chrome and ceramic, double hooks of chrome, double hooks of chrome and ceramic, wall mounted single hooks of chrome; screw-mounted chrome hooks, chrome drawer pulls | ACTIVE | Sep 29, 2000 |
| 020 | Non-metal hardware, namely, racks, double racks, non-metal wall mounted racks, all racks being storage racks, magnetic hooks; racks of chrome, single hook racks of chrome, metal double racks, double racks of chrome, all racks being storage racks | ACTIVE | Sep 29, 2000 |
| 021 | Toothbrush stands, canister sets, cans, namely, wastepaper baskets; toilet tissue roll reserve holders, towel holders, tissue stands, non-metal paper towel holders, non-metal paper towel holder stands, toilet brushes, self-adhesive razor holders, self-adhesive toothbrush holders, self-adhesive double toothbrush holders, chrome toilet tissue holders, ceramic toilet tissue holders, chrome finial towel rings, ceramic finial towel rings, chrome finial towel bars, ceramic finial towel bars, bath accessories, namely, valets, valets of chrome; napkin holders, spoon rests, spoon stands, soap savers, sink pumps for dispensing soap, dispensers for liquid soap, tumbler | ACTIVE | Sep 29, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by InterDesign, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by InterDesign, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by InterDesign, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named YORK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 6, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 6, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 6, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |