Drawing for BUGLE BOY JEAN CO.

USPTO serial 76423892

BUGLE BOY JEAN CO.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUGLE BOY JEAN CO.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald F. Frei, Esq.

DONALD F FREI ESQ WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP2700 CAREW TWR441 VINE STCINCINNATI, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Sunglasses and eyeglass framesACTIVE—
018Backpacks, waistpacks, duffle bags, luggage, wallets, leather key fobs, all purpose sport bags, beach bags, shoulder bags, tri- fold billfolds and pursesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 9, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 5, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 19, 2002CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 28, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance