Drawing for DR. BERLAND'S ADHES-A-DENT

USPTO serial 76423942

DR. BERLAND'S ADHES-A-DENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DR. BERLAND'S ADHES-A-DENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John A. Thomas

JOHN A THOMAS GLAST, PHILLIPS & MURRAY2200 ONE GALLERIA TWR13355 NOEL RD L B 48DALLAS, TX 75240-6657

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Denture adhesiveACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2005PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Mar 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2005PR.WPETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN—
Feb 22, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Oct 1, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 3, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 7, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 31, 2002CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 31, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance