USPTO serial 76423967
AMERICA'S 100 GREATEST GOLF COURSES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AMERICA'S 100 GREATEST GOLF COURSES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric E. Gisolfi
ERIC E GISOLFI SABIN, BERMANT & GOULD LLPFOUR TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Sporting goods and equipment, namely, golf bags, golf bag covers, golf bag tags, golf ball markers, golf balls, golf clubs, golf club covers, golf irons, golf putters, golf tees, grips for golf clubs, golf flags, golf tee markers, golf ball holders and tee holders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Advance Magazine Publishers Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Advance Magazine Publishers Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named AMERICA'S 100 GREATEST GOLF COURSES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |