USPTO serial 76424036
RACING VISIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RACING VISIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN C KUNZLER
BRIAN C KUNZLER KUNZLER & ASSOCIATES8 E BROADWAY STE 600SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, SCALE REMOTE CONTROL CARS, THREE-DIMENSIONAL VISION SYSTEMS FOR REMOTE CONTROL CARS, REMOTE CONTROL SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS FOR REMOTELY OPERATING SCALE MODEL CARS AND CONTROLLERS, TOY STEERING WHEELS, INTERNET RACING SYSTEMS FOR RACING REMOTE CONTROL CARS OVER THE INTERNET, AND DESTINATION AMUSEMENT PARK ATTRACTIONS, INCLUDING RACE TRACKS, FOR CONTROLLING AND RACING SCALE MODEL CARS | ACTIVE | Apr 22, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2004 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |