USPTO serial 76424208
FETISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FETISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
1017 CG Amsterdam, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. McGovern, Esq.
Jeffrey B. McGovern720 South Powerline RoadSuuite DDeerfield Beach, FL 33442Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Eyeglass cases and sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry, namely, bracelets, necklaces, rings, brooches and decorative belt buckles | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, women's, girls' and teens' underwear, sportswear namely sweatshirts, sweat pants, shorts, blouses and socks and sleep shirts, pajamas and night gowns, and belts | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | Decorative belt buckles and hair accessories, namely hair clips, hair bands, scrunchies and barrettes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Finanz St. Honore, B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named FETISH
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |