Drawing for ASTER

USPTO serial 76424224

ASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles P. LaPolla, Esq

CHARLES P LAPOLLA ESQ OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN, LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Diamonds and precious gemstones; jewelry, namely, earrings, rings, bracelets, charms, necklaces, pendants, pins and broochesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 8, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 31, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jan 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 30, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance