USPTO serial 76424233
AXCESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AXCESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Kirschstein
GENE BOLMARCICH LIZ CLAIBORNE INCONE CLAIBORNE AVENORTH BERGEN, NJ 07047UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | HANDBAGS, WALLETS AND LEATHER KEY CHAINS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |