Drawing for SECURITY BIOMETRICS

USPTO serial 76424261

SECURITY BIOMETRICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEARIN, AMY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SECURITY BIOMETRICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Deborah Henscheid

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT SNELL & WILMER LLPONE AZ CTR400 E VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004-2202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for use with identification systems and point-of-sale transaction systems for identifying and verifying identity of individuals using fingerprint, voice, eye and facial feature dataACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 19, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 28, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 5, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 23, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 5, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 8, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance