USPTO serial 76424261
SECURITY BIOMETRICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SECURITY BIOMETRICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah Henscheid
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPARTMENT SNELL & WILMER LLPONE AZ CTR400 E VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004-2202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for use with identification systems and point-of-sale transaction systems for identifying and verifying identity of individuals using fingerprint, voice, eye and facial feature data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 19, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |