USPTO serial 76424323
EKSIGENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2887125Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 2004
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EKSIGENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAURA M. LLOYD
ELIZABETH SWANSON SHELDON MAK ROSE & ANDERSON PC100 CORSON STREET, THIRD FLOORPASADENA, CA 91103-3842UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Microfluid handling devices for medical use, namely pumps, electrokinetic pumps, valves, pumps for a glucose monitoring devices, and pumps for insulin delivery devices | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jun 8, 2003 |
| 011 | Pump as part of a cooling system for electronic device cooling | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 8, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eksigent Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Eksigent Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Eksigent Technologies, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named EKSIGENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2011 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | C7P. | CANCELLED SEC. 7 - PARTIAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | C7PF | RQST FOR SECT 7 PARTIAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 3, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2010 | ERTR | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 30, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |