Drawing for VIVIDOCS

USPTO serial 76424453

VIVIDOCS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIVIDOCS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura Talley Geyer, Esq.

LAURA TALLEY GEYER ESQ JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE51 LOUISIANA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20001-2113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SOFTWARE FOR AN OPERATING SYSTEM ENVIRONMENT THAT DRAWS INFORMATION FROM MULTIPLE TEXT-BASED SOURCES TO CREATE BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS, CITATIONS OR OTHER INFORMATION THAT INTERACTIVELY REFERENCES INFORMATION IN A DOCUMENT BEING WRITTEN OR READ BY A USERACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 24, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 22, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 31, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 23, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance