USPTO serial 76424512
SOLARFROST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 7, 2006
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SOLARFROST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Solarfrost-Forschung Dr. Kunze OEG
A-3012 Wolfsgraben, AT
Other trademarks owned by Solarfrost-Forschung Dr. Kunze OEG
Solarfrost-Forschung Dr. Kunze OEG
A-3012 Wolfsgraben, AT
Other trademarks owned by Solarfrost-Forschung Dr. Kunze OEG
Solarfrost-Forschung Dr. Kunze OEG
A-3012 Wolfsgraben, AT
Other trademarks owned by Solarfrost-Forschung Dr. Kunze OEG
SOLARFROST FORSCHUNG UND ENTWICKLUNG GMBH.
3002 PURKERSDORF, AT
Other trademarks owned by SOLARFROST FORSCHUNG UND ENTWICKLUNG GMBH.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | COOLING DEVICES AND INSTALLATIONS NAMELY, REFRIGERATED CONTAINERS REFRIGERATION CHAMBERS, REFRIGERATORS,REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS FOR LIQUIDS AND AIR, NAMELY WATER COOLERS AND AIR CONDITIONERS, REFRIGERATION UNITS FOR USE IN REFRIGERATING TOBACCO, FOR USE IN REFRIGERATING MILK AND WATER; HEATING INSTALLATIONS NAMELY SOLAR HEATERS, SOLAR CELLS, SOLAR POWERED HEATERS, COOLERS, AND AIR CONDITIONERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 11, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Solarfrost-Forschung Dr. Kunze OEG
- Other trademarks owned by Solarfrost-Forschung Dr. Kunze OEG
- Other trademarks owned by Solarfrost-Forschung Dr. Kunze OEG
- Other trademarks owned by SOLARFROST FORSCHUNG UND ENTWICKLUNG GMBH.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named SOLARFROST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 7, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 20, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |