USPTO serial 76424523
MI GENTE ES ALGO DIFERENTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3083152Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 18, 2006
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MI GENTE ES ALGO DIFERENTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julianne B. Bochinski, Esq.
JULIANNE B BOCHINSKI ESQP O BOX 2723WESTPORT, CT 06880-0723UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, A WEEKLY NEWSPAPER AND MAGAZINE ON THE SUBJECT OF NATIONAL NEWS, POLITICAL COMMENTARY, SOCIETY NEWS, ARTS, SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT FOR THE HISPANIC COMMUNITY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |