USPTO serial 76424800
COLOURS+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLOURS+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm D. St. Landau
C/O DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP NORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST NWSTE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | DIETARY FOOD SUPPLEMENTS IN POWDERED MIX, LIQUID, CAPSULE OR TABLET FROM COMPRISED OF DRIED PLANTS, HERBS, PROBIOITICS, ESSENTIAL FATTY ACIDS, VITAMINS, MINERALS AND OTHER NUTRIENTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 19, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |