Drawing for KEN'S STEAK HOUSE

USPTO serial 76425102

KEN'S STEAK HOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLD, BARBARA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KEN'S STEAK HOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN F WARD

JOHN F WARD BROMBERG & SUNSTEIN LLP125 SUMMER STBOSTON, MA 02110-1618UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030full line of sauces, dressings and marinadesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 6, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 21, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Jul 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 19, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 29, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance