USPTO serial 76425179
NONSTOPGAMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NONSTOPGAMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Indianapolis, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin L. Sage
JUSTIN L SAGE KRIEG DEVAULT LLPONE INDIANA SQ - STE 2800INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | RENTAL OF VIDEO GAMES AND COMPUTER GAMES; RENTAL OF VIDEO GAMES AND COMPUTER GAMES BY MEANS OF A WORLDWIDE COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING INFORMATION, REVIEWS AND PERSONALIZED RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE FIELD OF ENTERTAINMENT, NAMELY, VIDEO AND COMPUTER GAMES; PROVIDING INFORMATION, REVIEWS AND PERSONALIZED RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE FIELD OF ENTERTAINMENT, NAMELY, VIDEO AND COMPUTER GAMES, BY MEANS OF A WORLDWIDE COMPUTER NETWORK; RETAIL STORE SERVICES AND COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE RETAIL SERVICES FEATURING VIDEO AND COMPUTER GAMES, GAME CONSOLES AND RELATED ACCESSORIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |