USPTO serial 76425216
SILICON FOR THE SENSES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SILICON FOR THE SENSES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-79108 Freiburg, DE
D-79108 Freiburg, DE
D-79108 Freiburg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. O'Shea,
PATRICK J OSHEA O'SHEA, GETZ & KOSAKOWSKI PC1500 MAIN ST STE 912SPRINGFIELD, MA 01115UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Semiconductors; consumer electronics, namely audio, video and multimedia devices, namely audio disc recorders, flat panel displays and audio playback devices; analog and digital mobile telephones; digital signal processors; decoders, namely signal audio, video and channel; television and video apparatus, namely, DVD players and recorders; consumer electronics, namely video and audio devices, namely audio disc recorders, flat panel displays and audio playback devices; television, radio and satellite receivers; tape recording and reproduction apparatus, namely, cassette, VHS and beta recording and reproduction devices, namely, CD players, DVD players and VCRs; multimedia apparatus namely, pre-recorded compact discs, DVDs and minidisks containing audio and video processing related software and firmware used for conversion, encoding recording, decoding reproduction, transmission and management of audio and video data; data and image carriers, namely, magneto-optic and electro-optic data storage devices, and USB storage devices, namely, packaged semiconductors; sound amplifiers and loudspeakers; pressure sensors to air pressure gauges; magnetic field sensors for valve timing; frequency filters; radio frequency and telecommunications equipment, namely, mobile telephones; computers; computer hardware; sensor systems comprised of semiconductive material for biological, chemical, magnetic and pressure applications and measurements, including measurements of gases, chemicals and other substances | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANCY AND CONSULTING FOR ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS CONSULTING AND MANAGEMENT PLANNING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY SATELLITE TRANSMISSION FOR ANALOGUE AND DIGITAL RADIO AND TELEVISION TRANSMISSION, MOBILE TELEPHONE; ELECTRONIC, ELECTRIC AND DIGITAL TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA, IMAGES, SIGNALS AND MESSAGES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | DESIGN AND UPDATING FOR OTHERS OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER SEMI CONDUCTORS AND INTEGRATED GEARS; RESEARCH FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD MICRO ELECTRONICS, SEMICONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGY AND COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY; CONSULTING IN THE FIELD OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT; PATENT AND COPYRIGHT EXPLOITATION; NAMELY LICENSING OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Micronas Holding GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Micronas Holding GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Micronas Holding GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SILICON FOR THE SENSES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 10, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |