Drawing for FTD

USPTO serial 76425333

FTD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FTD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce A. Tassan

SCOTT J MAJOR MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Paints, namely, interior and exterior paints, insulating paints, watercolor paints, paints for artists, arts and crafts paints, spray paints, and paints for use on industrial equipment and machinery, models, furniture, automobiles and other itemsACTIVE—
003Cosmetics namely, mascara, face powder, makeup, makeup remover, corrective powder, foundation, bronzer, lipstick, lip pencil, lip gloss, lip liner, lip balm, lip color, lip primer, eye shadow, eyeliner, eyebrow pencil, eye base, eye color, eye primer, eye cream, cover up, rouge, nail polish, nail care preparations, skin care preparations, cleansing preparation for the face and body, cuticle conditioners, cuticle creams, cuticle removing preparations, moisturizers, tonics, and hair care preparations; cleaning preparations, namely, carpet cleaner, wood cleaner, all-purpose cleaner, all-purpose household cleaner, glass cleaner, furniture polish, oven cleaner, upholstery cleaner, and automobile cleaner; soaps, namely, face, hand and body soapsACTIVE—
004CANDLESACTIVE—
016Publications, namely, books, newsletters, magazines, catalogues, guides and periodicals, in the fields of floristry and floral arrangement, and gift wrapping paperACTIVE—
021Housewares, namely, gardening tools and gloves; and glassACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, including pants, shirts, t-shirts, sweater, dresses, skirts, jackets, blouses, skorts, shorts, sweat pants, sweatshirts, vests, socks, shoes, belts, rainwear, shells, pullovers, ties, scarves, hats, caps, gloves and apronsACTIVE—
026Fancy goods, namely, artificial flowers, fruit and plants, bows and ribbon for gift wrapping, and non-paper gift wrapACTIVE—
027Floor coverings, namely, rugs, carpets, mats, linoleum and vinyl coverings, and tileACTIVE—
029Meats; gourmet food items, including processed gourmet meats, vegetables, fruits, snack foods, pastas, sauces, cheeses and other dairy itemsACTIVE—
030A FULL RANGE OF STAPLE FOODSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 9, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 15, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 12, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 29, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance