Drawing for WIDESTREAM

USPTO serial 76425387

WIDESTREAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
OFFICE OF THE TRADEMARK COMMISSIONER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WIDESTREAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Virginia L. Carron

VIRGINIA L CARRON FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL901 NEW YORK AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Access and Home computer networks and systems, signal distribution networks and systems, comprising asymmetric digital subscriber line, fiber ethernet accesses, wireless local area network (LAN) products, namely, mobile computing environment, wireless ethernet adapters, wireless ethernet dual access points, wireless ethernet access points and starter kits comprising installation Cd roms, manuals, fiber cutting kits, wireless gateway for home and business applications, wireless modules for handhelds; wireless LAN antennas and wireless LAN power injectors; domotic appliances, namely, set top boxes, web cams, xDSL enabled consumer electronics goods, alarm systems, remote controlled appliances, digital subscriber line (DSL) terminations and distribution equipment and devices, namely, modems, switches, routers, hubs, voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) integrated access devices, wireless fidelity (WIFI) access points and repeaters, adapters for use in the above broadband access systems; Passive Optical Network (PON) for applications in LAN, Metro Area Network (MAN) comprising optical network unit (ONU) and optical line termination (OLT) switches/routers, PDH (Plesiochronous Digital Hierachy), access multiplexers, DSL multiptexers; last mile telecommunication equipment, namely, media converters, modems, gateways, switches, routers, multiplexers, home networking appliances; set-top boxes (STB), namely, VCRs, cable boxes, other television appliances, namely, set top boxes, video stations with cameras, VCRs, displays; DSL equipment, namely, modems, switches, routers, hubs, "smart home" appliances (domotic applications), namely, set top boxes, video stations with cameras, remote controlled home appliances, video conferencing STB, Internet protocol television (IPTV), STB, namely, customer premise equipment (CPE) and integrated access device (lAD); optical connectors, power suppliers, fan-out namely to separate the individual fibers or buffer tubes of a fiber-optic cable for the purpose of splicing or installing optical connectors; splices, optical splitters; end-to-end video solutions, namely, video encoders, video servers, set top boxes, video cameras; video encoders and software namely for complete Internet protocol (IP) video broadcasting; optical cables, electrical cables, coaxial cables for telecommunication network cablesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Sep 15, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 30, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Aug 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 30, 2004ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
Mar 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 6, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Oct 9, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Aug 28, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 20021.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED
Dec 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 1, 2002AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Aug 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance