Drawing for UNICORN

USPTO serial 76425390

UNICORN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNICORN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicole E Coppes-Gathy

NICOLE E COPPES-GATHY TOBIN, CARBERRY, O'MALLEY, RILEY, SELING43 BROAD ST PO BOX 58NEW LONDON, CT 06320-0058UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009VEHICLE COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM COMPRISED OF ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS ON ONE VEHICLE FOR DETECTING OTHER NEARBY VEHICLESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 15, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 4, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 22, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 7, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 14, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 8, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance