USPTO serial 76425427
WONDER-SHIRTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WONDER-SHIRTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cleveland Heights, OH
Cleveland Heights, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank H. Andorka
FRANK H ANDORKA BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP1900 E 9TH ST STE 3200NATIONAL CITY CTRCLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING FOR MEN, WOMEN, AND CHILDREN, NAMELY, SHIRTS | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |