USPTO serial 76425441
MSABANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MSABANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
WEBSTER BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
WATERBURY, CT
Other trademarks owned by WEBSTER BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
WATERBURY, CT
Howards Grove, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane Duhaime and all other members of and attorneys associated with each office of Jorden Burt LLP, with full power of substitution and revocation
DIANE DUHAIME JORDEN BURT LLP175 POWDER FOREST DR STE 201SIMSBURY, CT 06089UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Banking services; Internet and on-line banking services; offering medical savings accounts; providing medical savings account services, namely, administration of medical savings accounts, medical savings account custodial services, medical savings account trustee services, medical savings account security brokerage services, medical savings account debit card services and medical savings account checking services | ACTIVE | Aug 27, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WEBSTER BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
- Other trademarks owned by WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by State Bank of Howards Grove
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named MSABANK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 25, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 4, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |