USPTO serial 76425666
PCALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PCALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven M. Rabin,
JAMES M SLATTERY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Import and export agencies and dealerships in the field of computers and computer accessories | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |