USPTO serial 76425733
HOGWASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOGWASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott Allan Nelson
2232 YOSEMITE DR APT # 203LOS ANGELES, CA 90041UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services featuring women that are scantily dressed washing and cleaning motorcycles inside a bar, saloon, casino, hotel, nightclub or outside | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2007 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |