USPTO serial 76425802
FIELD-INFO XPRESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIELD-INFO XPRESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Atsugi City, Kanagawa 243-0036, JP
Atsugi City, Kanagawa 243-0036, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Herbert J. Singer
HERBERT J SINGER SILVERMAN, CASS & SINGER, LTD105 W ADAMS ST STE 2225CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR ENABLING DIALUP INTERNET PROTOCOL CONNECTION AND INTERNET DATA SENDING AND RECEIVING FOR USE IN SURVEYING INSTRUMENTS | ACTIVE | Jan 21, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |