USPTO serial 76425846
MIGHTY MULCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIGHTY MULCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles S. Knothe, Esquire
CHARLES S KNOTHE ESQ CHARLES S. KNOTHE, PA14 THE CMNS 3516 SILVERSIDE RDWILMINGTON, DE 19810-4932UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | landscaping mulch | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |