USPTO serial 76425908
Serial No. 76425908
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 76425908?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
King of Prussia, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES N. QUINN
CHARLES N QUINN FOX, ROTHSCHILD, O'BRIEN & FRANKEL2000 MARKET ST 10TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3291UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Portable metal hardness testers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 29, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |