USPTO serial 76425938
IM VISUAL TRUST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IM VISUAL TRUST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michelle C. Burke, Esq.
MICHELLE C BURKE ESQ MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY227 W MONROE STSTE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606-5096Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for website certification and authentication | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Providing on-line digital website certification services for others in e-commerce transactions, namely, providing support and maintenance services for on-line digital website certification software; providing on-line user certification and authentication services for others in e-commerce transactions, namely, providing support and maintenance services for on-line user certification and authentication software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named IM VISUAL TRUST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |