Drawing for ILLUMS SCANDIAVIAN INTERIOR CULTURE

USPTO serial 76426243

ILLUMS SCANDIAVIAN INTERIOR CULTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIM, YONG OH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ILLUMS SCANDIAVIAN INTERIOR CULTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Clarke Holman

JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 SEVENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035EXPORT, IMPORT, WHOLESALE AND RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING HOUSEHOLD FURNISHINGS, TABLEWARE, TEXTILES FOR CLOTHING, CLOTHING AND FOOTWEAR, UMBRELLAS, TRUNKS AND TRAVELING BAGS, SMOKER'S ARTICLES, ARTISTIC HANDICRAFT, TIME PIECES, EYEGLASSES, TOYS, MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS AND RECORDINGS, TOOLS FOR CARPENTRY AND GARDENING, SPORTS GOODS AND OFFICE SUPPLIESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 15, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 22, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 10, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 24, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 4, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 22, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance