Drawing for REAL LIFE WITH STYLE

USPTO serial 76426282

REAL LIFE WITH STYLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRENCH, CURTIS W
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with REAL LIFE WITH STYLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph V.Norvell

JOSEPH V NORVELL BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEPO BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016periodically printed publications, namely a magazine and catalog featuring articles and information on general subject matter, general merchandise and general consumer goodsABANDONEDFeb 14, 2002
035Business advice and consultation in the field of direct sales of general merchandise and general consumer goods; retail store, mail order catalog, shop at home parties, on-line retail and mail order services, but not home shopping services by means of television, featuring general merchandise and general consumer goods, namely, antiques, aroma/scent products, bakeware, baking/cooking utensils, baskets and basketware, bathroom accessories, bedding, bowls, candles, ceramics, Christmas ornaments, clocks, coat and hat racks, collectables, cookware, crafts, cups, doormats, framed prints, furniture, gardening accessories, gifts, housewares, kitchenware, lamps, napkins, luggage, oil lamps, picnic accessories, picture frames, placemats, plates, potholders, potpourri, rugs, saucers, serving trays, storage containers, tablecloths, tables, tableware, towels, vases, wall hangings, wine racks, wooden plaques, and wooden shelvesABANDONEDFeb 14, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 21, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 21, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 21, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 6, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 13, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 17, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 5, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 4, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 9, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance