USPTO serial 76426475
TRIFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRIFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip L. Conrad
Bruce D. Jobse Rissman Jobse Hendricks & Oliverio, LLP100 Cambridge Street Suite 2101BOSTON, MA 02114UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Synthetic resins and unprocessed artificial resins for use in a wide variety of fields; plastics in dispersions, and solutions; plastic molding compounds for use in the manufacture of molded plastic articles | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | Packing, stopping and insulating materials for building and road construction, namely for liquid applied roofing systems, for terraces, for balconies, for parking levels, for floors, for roads and for pavements building insulation; jointing material for masonry and pavement; seals for masonry and pavement joints; coating materials for sealing, packing, stopping, insulating and protective building materials; adhesive sealants for general use; adhesive sealant and caulking compound | ABANDONED | Jul 11, 2000 |
| 027 | Protective floor coverings; hard surface coverings for floors | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | Building sealing and caulking services; installation of building insulation; roofing installation; floor installation; painting, lacquering and dehumidify buildings; wallpaper application | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Follmann & Co. Gesellschaft Fur Chemie-Werkstoffe Und-Verfahrenstechnik MBH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Follmann & Co. Gesellschaft Fur Chemie-Werkstoffe Und-Verfahrenstechnik MBH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named TRIFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 27, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 27, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 27, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |