USPTO serial 76426531
UMILL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UMILL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FIN-02200 Espoo, FI
FIN-02200 Espoo, FI
FI-02101 ESPOO, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott Greenberg and David H. Pfeffer; Harry C. Marcus; J. Robert Dailey; Eugene Moroz; John F. Sweeney; Arnold I. Rady; Christopher A. Hughes; William S. Feiler; James W. Gould; Richard C. Komson; Christopher K. Hu; Bartholomew Verdirame; Maria C.H. Lin;
SCOTT GREENBERG MORGAN & FINNEGAN LLP3 WORLD FINANCIAL CTRNEW YORK, NY 10281-2101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | WIRES MADE OF COPPER OR COPPER ALLOYS | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | ROLLING MILLS FOR THE MANUFACTURING OF COPPER OR COPPER ALLOYS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | MANAGEMENT, OPERATING AND CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, FACILITIES MANAGEMENT FOR FACILITIES FOR THE MANUFACTURING OF COPPER OR COPPER ALLOYS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Outokumpu Oyj
- Other trademarks owned by Outokumpu Oyj
- Other trademarks owned by LUVATA OY
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named UMILL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |