USPTO serial 76426817
NATURAL DENIM PINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATURAL DENIM PINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Beliveau
Susan Beliveau Susan M. Beliveau#202, 5005 24th StreetVernon, V1T 8X7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Raw, remanufactured, finger jointed, outdoor, edge glued, ready to assemble, turned, pressure-treated and dimensional wood products, namely, lumber, lumber in the form of cants, squares, blanks, blocks, paneling; plywood, wood veneers, laminate wooden flooring; wood composites in the nature of wood beams, wood joints, wood joists, wood moldings, wood paneling and wood posts; wooden construction elements, namely, stairs, stair treads, stair risers, railings for use in fences and banisters, building materials, namely, decking; finished and unfinished window and door frames, exterior and interior doors and garage doors, fencing and fence panels, siding, shingles, stakes; prefabricated wooden buildings and structures, and log homes; building materials, structural products and engineered wood products, namely, roof and floor trusses, glulam beams, I-beams, paralam beams, joists; pre-cut garden sheds and miliwork exclusive of cabinets | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Wood packaging in the nature of skid pallets, pallets, bins, box stock, namely, wooden boxes made from stock lumber; crates; pre-cut, pre-assembled and ready-to-assemble furniture; cabinets, furniture; wooden boxes; storage racks and wall-mounted gun racks; caskets; wooden garden stakes and ten stakes, wooden sculptures and carvings | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Undressed timber and unsawn timber | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 17, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |