Drawing for ARTESIAN THERAPEUTICS

USPTO serial 76426822

ARTESIAN THERAPEUTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HICKEY,TONI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARTESIAN THERAPEUTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter J. Willsey,

PETER J. WILLSEY, COOLEY GODWARD LLPONE FREEDOM SQ RESTON TOWN CTR11951 FREEDOM DRRESTON, VA 20190-5601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of cardiovascular conditions and diseasesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 21, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 21, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 24, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 21, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 21, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 29, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance