Drawing for SVALOF WEIBULL

USPTO serial 76426935

SVALOF WEIBULL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARRUTHERS, SUE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SVALOF WEIBULL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kaushal R. Odedra, Esq.

KAUSHAL R ODEDRA ESQ WENDEROTH, LIND & PONACK, LLP2033 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1021UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Soil, bark humus, dressing bark, including nutritionally enriched and nutritionally balanced humus and bark, soil-conditioning chemicals, manuresACTIVE—
005Preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicidesACTIVE—
031Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products, namely unprocessed cereals, oil seeds, forage, fresh legumes, non-artificial turf grasses, field peas, fresh potatoes, vegetable seeds, agricultural grains for planting; fresh fruits and vegetables; seeds, namely, agricultural seeds and flower seeds; living plants and flowersACTIVE—
042Scientific and industrial research and analysis in the fields of plant breeding, seeds, horticulture and agriculture; licensing of intellectual property, in particular patent rights, plant variety rights and know-how in the fields of plant breeding, seeds, horticulture and agriculture; plant breeding; plant variety protectionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 4, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 21, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 25, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance